[2026:RJ-JP:20394] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7511/2026 1. Zuber S/o Hussaina, Aged About 45 Years, R/o Kidaner @ Kanchaner, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). 2. Goli @ Shahzad S/o Hussaina, Aged About 55 Years, R/o Kidaner @ Kanchaner, Police Station Jurhara, District Deeg. (At Present Accused Is Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Arafat Hussain For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 14/05/2026 1. The petitioners have preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.380/2024 registered at Police Station Sikri, District Deeg for offences under Sections 3, 5 and 8 of RBA Act. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Though the allegation against the present petitioners is with regard to transporting bovine animals, however, the petitioners were not present at the place of occurrence and no recovery was effected from them. The petitioners have been in custody since [2026:RJ-JP:20394] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7511/2026] 28.04.2026. It is further submitted that one case has been registered against petitioner Zuber; however, in the said case he has already been granted bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Zuber S/o Hussaina and Goli @ Shahzad S/o Hussaina, be released on bail provided each of them furnish a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that they shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Arun/77