( 2026:JHHC:11487 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 12111 of 2025 ------ Ajit Kumar Yadav @ Ajit Yadav, aged about 25 years, son of Umesh Yadav, resident of village- Chuku, P.O. & P.S.- Herhanj, District- Latehar .... .... …. Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Jitendra Shankar Singh, Advocate : Mrs. Shabina Perween, Advocate : Ms. Sumitra Kumari, Advocate For the State : Mr. Ajay Kr Pathak, A.P.P. ------ Order No:-05 Dated:-20-04-2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Herhanj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 registered for the offence punishable under Sections 109(1), 118(1), 126(2), 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to commit murder to Rohit Kumar Singh with a lathi. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is then submitted that the assault on the head of the victim with iron rod is against Rupesh Kumar Yadav and also the assault with a lathi is against Sandip Yadav. It is also submitted by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there is no allegation of the petitioner hitting the head of the victim, where the victim has sustained grievous injury. It is next submitted that the charge sheet has been submitted in this case and no witness has been examined as yet. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.11.2025 as is evident from para-11 of the instant bail application. It is also submitted that the petitioner has no criminal antecedent as mentioned in Para-10 of the Bail Application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case and also undertakes not to annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned counsel appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, Latehar in connection with Herhanj P.S. Case No. 49 of 2025 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case and he will annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Dated :- 20.04.2 0 2 6 Nand i ni /