ASHUTOSH NAMAN S/O SHRI NAVEEN KUMAR SARANGI v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/6461/2026 · 2026-05-20
Praveer Bhatnagar
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7042 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7042 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:21423] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6461/2026 Ashutosh Naman S/o Shri Naveen Kumar Sarangi, R/o Mahthor, Darbhanga, Bihar- 847423. ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tapeshwar Pal Singh Parmar, Adv. Ms. Chhaya Sharma, Adv. Mr. Ankit Kumar, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Chaudhary, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAVEER BHATNAGAR
Order 20/05/2026
1. Apprehending his arrest in connection with FIR No.61/2025, registered with Police Station Cyber Police Station, Commissionerate Jaipur, Deputy Commissioner for the offences under Sections 66-C and 66-D of I.T. Act, the accused-petitioner has preferred this criminal miscellaneous bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S.
2.
Learned counsel for the accused-petitioner submits that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is contended that accused-petitioner is ready and willing to cooperate with the investigation and to submit his mobile phone, therefore, his anticipatory bail application may be allowed.
3. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the grant of anticipatory bail application and submitted the factual report. In the factual report, the Investigating Officer has stated that the petitioner despite service of notices is not appearing and if he is granted the anticipatory bail then he may manipulate the
[2026:RJ-JP:21423] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6461/2026] electronic evidence present against him, therefore, the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner may be dismissed.
4. Heard and perused material available on record.
5. Admittedly, the Investigating Officer has no right to arrest the petitioner as per Section 77-B of the I.T. Act, the offences are bailable and the petitioner is ready and willing to appear before the Investigating Officer, therefore, considering the aforesaid
facts, this Court deems it just and proper to allow the anticipatory bail application of the accused-petitioner.
6. Accordingly, the anticipatory bail application under Section 482 of B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is ordered that in the event of arrest of the accused-petitioner- Ashutosh Naman S/o Shri Naveen Kumar Sarangi, in connection with FIR No.61/2025, registered with Police Station Cyber Police Station, Commissionerate Jaipur, Deputy Commissioner, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the S.H.O of the concerned Police Station on the following conditions:- (i) that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii) that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii) that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court.
(PRAVEER BHATNAGAR),J Ashwani Kr Srivastava/-80