Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 70411 (MAD)

S.NATARAJAN v. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR

WP/5863/2026 · 2026-02-19

M Dhandapani

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

W.P.No.5863 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 19.02.2026 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.P.No.5863 of 2026 S.Natarajan ... Petitioner Vs. 1. The Managing Director, TWAD Board Head Office, No.31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai–5. 2. The Secretary-cum-General Manager, TWAD Board Head Office, No.31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai–5. ....Respondents PRAYER : Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus, to direct the respondents herein to consider and pass orders on the petitioner’s representation dated 13.10.2025 submitted for release all his retirement benefits such as pension, DCRG, commutation and other benefits along with interest as per the last _________ p. 2 W.P.No.5863 of 2026 pay drawn by him, having retired from service on 31.05.2025 as Assistant Accounts Officer on superannuation from TWAD Board, RWS Division, Kancheepuram. For Petitioner : Mr.V.R.Appaswamee For Respondents : Ms.Y.Kavitha O R D E R This Writ Petition has been filed to direct the respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.10.2025 submitted by him. 2. The case of the petitioner is that the petitioner made a representation on 13.10.2025 to disburse the retirement benefits such as DCRG, Commutation and other benefits along with interest based on the last drawn pay to which the petitioner is entitled to. Since the same was not considered, the present writ petition has been filed. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner would submit that it would suffice, if the first respondent is directed to dispose of the _________ p. 3 W.P.No.5863 of 2026 representation of the petitioner dated 13.10.2025 on merits and in accordance with law, within a specified period. 4. The learned counsel appearing for the respondents has no objection for such an order being passed by this Court. 5. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner and learned counsel appearing for the respondents. 6. In view of the limited request made by the learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this Court, without going into the merits of the case, directs the first respondent to consider the representation of the petitioner dated 13.10.2025 and pass appropriate orders on merits and in accordance with law within a period of six weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. _________ p. 4 W.P.No.5863 of 2026 7. With the above direction, this Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. 19.02.2026 NCC: Yes / No Index : Yes / No Speaking Order : Yes / No ssb To 1. The Managing Director, TWAD Board Head Office, No.31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. 2. The Secretary-cum-General Manager, TWAD Board Head Office, No.31, Kamarajar Salai, Chepauk, Chennai – 5. _________ p. 5 W.P.No.5863 of 2026 M.DHANDAPANI, J. ssb W.P.No.5863 of 2026 19.02.2026 _________