Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7038 (HP)

TULE SINGH v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/355/2026 · 2026-03-16

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Tule Singh versus State of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MP(M) No.355 of 2026 16.03.2026 Present: Ms. Vishali Lakhanpal, Advocate vice Mr. Rakesh Kumar Chaudhary, Advocate, for the applicant-appellant. Mr. Raj Negi, Deputy Advocate General, for the respondent-State. Cr.MP(M) No.355 of 2026 Applicant-appellant is a convict and serving his sentence in Model Central Jail Nahan, District Sirmour, H.P. This application has been filed against conviction, with delay of 35 days in filing the appeal. Taking into consideration entire facts and circumstances as well as averments made in the application and submission made by learned counsel for the applicant-appellant, delay in filing the appeal is condoned. Application is allowed and disposed of. Cr. Appeal No._________ of 2026 [Cr.A (C-DB) ST No.828/2026] Appeal be registered. Notice. Mr. Raj Negi, learned Deputy Advocate General, appears, waives and accepts service of notice on behalf of the respondent- State. Admit. Record be requisitioned. List for hearing in due course. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) March 16, 2026 Judge [Shivender]