Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7038 (AP)

Shriram General Insurance Company Limited v. KILARI CHINNA @ CHINNAMMA

CRP/2603/2025 · 2026-07-26

Subba Reddy Satti

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010462812025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2603/2025 Between: 1. SHRIRAM GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, PLOT NO. 101, GUDEM PLAZA, NEAR SHIVA SANKAR AUTOMOBILES, VENKATARAJU NAGAR, DONDAPARTHY, VISAKHAPATNAM. ...PETITIONER AND 1. KILARI CHINNA CHINNAMMA, W/O LAXMAYYA, AGED 55 YEARS. VEGETABLES BUSINESS, R/O. H.NO. 1-81, AMBATIVALASA VILLAGE, BONDAPALLI MANDAL, VIZIANAGARAM DISTRICT 2. K VENKATESH, S/O LATE LAKSHMANA RAO, HINDU, AGED 34 YEARS. DRIVER -CUM- OWNER OF MOTOR CYCLE BEARING NO. AP 35 AD 8819 FLAT NO.204, VUDA COLONY, PHASE-II, RAMASURYA RESIDENCY, VIZIANAGARAM- 535 003 ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the CRP by setting aside the order dated 20.01.2025 in I.A.No.66 of 2024 in MVOP No.554 of 2022 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal -Cum- V Additional District a Sessions Judge (Women Court), Vizianagaram, filed by the Revision Petitioner herein/ Petitioner in lA /Respondent No.2 in the main MVOP in the lower court and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in MVOP No.554 of 2022 on the file of Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal- Cum-V Additional District &. Sessions Judge (Women Court), Vizianagaram pending disposal of the above revision petition and pass such Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. A JAYANTHI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. TADDI SOWMYA NAIDU The Court made the following order: Ms. A.Jayanthi, learned counsel for the revision petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition. 2. Permission is accorded. 3. Accordingly, this civil revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn. No order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, in this case, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 27.07.2026 SNI 110 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2603 OF 2025 Dated: 27.07.2026 SNI