Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7037 (ALL)

OMKANT PANDEY v. STATE OF U P AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/24949/2019 · 2026-09-14

Prakash Padia, Vivek Saran

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 24949 of 2019 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The petitioner has preferred present writ petition inter-alia with the following prayers :- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents not to demolish construction of the petitioner over the land situated in Mohalla Purana Ait Tehsil Orai District Jalaun. (b) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents to consider and decide the representation dated 08.07.2019 of the petitioner and till disposal of the representation dated 08.07.2019 of the applicant the respondents be restrained that they may not demolish construction of the petitioner over the land situated in Mohalla Purana Ait Tehsil Orai District Jalaun." 2. In the counter affidavit filed by the respondent-State in paragraph-7 it is stated that petitioner had himself removed the encroachment, which was made over the old N.H. 25 Orai. It is further stated that petitioner raised a Chabutara on the government land and since petitioner has himself removed the encroachment no further action be taken in the matter. The paragraph-7 reads as follows :- "7. That, after issuing notice the petitioner had himself removed the encroachment, which was made over the old N.H. 25 Orai. Petitioner raised a Chabutara on the government land and since petitioner has himself removed the encroachment no further action be taken in the matter." Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Babu Lal Ram, Laxmi Narayan Rathour, Rajiv Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : Alok Kumar Singh, C.S.C. Omkant Pandey .....Petitioner(s) State Of U P And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) 3. After going through the aforesaid paragraph, the Court is of the opinion that no relief could be granted to the petitioner as prayed for in the present writ petition hence present writ petition is liable to be dismissed 4. Accordingly, present writ petition is dismissed. September 15, 2026 Pramod Tripathi WRIC No. 24949 of 2019 2 (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Digitally signed by :- PRAMOD TRIPATHI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad