Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7035 (AP)

PENUMATSA KONDARAJU v. VEGESINA RAMAKRISHNARAJU

CRP/2177/2025 · 2026-07-26

Subba Reddy Satti

Original Suitbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010453862025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 2177/2025 Between: 1. PENUMATSA KONDARAJU, S/O. SKATHISWARA RAJU, AGE YEARS, R/O. D.NO. 7-7-36, NARASAYA AGRAHARAM, NEAR GUNPUDI REGISTRATION OFFICE, BHIMAVARAM, WG DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. VEGESINA RAMAKRISHNARAJU, S/o. Venkata Narasimharaju, Age 34 years. Proprietor Sri Vijayalakshmi Traders, China Amiram, Bhimavaram Mandal, W.G.District. ...RESPONDENT Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein, the High Court may be pleased to allow the Revision Petition and set aside the order dt 04-08-2025 passed in E.P.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.51 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge, (Senior Division) at Eluru, and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings including sale of execution dated 04-08- 2025 proceedings in E.P.No.3 of 2024 in O.S No.51 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge, (Senior Division) West Godavari District at Eluru, pending disposal of the main CRP and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. CHAKRAVARTHY P V S K Counsel for the Respondent: 1. K K DURGA PRASAD The Court made the following order: Heard Sri P.V.S.K.Chakravarthy, learned counsel for the revision petitioner. 2. Assailing the order dated 04.08.2025 in E.P.No.3 of 2024 in O.S.No.51 of 2012 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Senior Division), Eluru, the above revision was filed. 3. Pending the revision, the issue was settled before the Lok Adalat, and an Award was passed on 13.12.2025. 4. Given the developments pending the revision petition, the cause in the revision petition does not survive. 5. Recording the same, the civil revision petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Dated: 27.07.2026 SNI 120 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION No.2177 of 2025 Dated: 27.07.2026 SNI