1 2026:CGHC:17407 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 1534 of 2026 1 - Bibhas Das S/o Late Shri Sukumar Das Aged About 58 Years R/o.- C/o Maa, Reverend Shrimati Kamala Das, Village.- Itina Colony, Block C, P.O. Banipur, P.S. Habra, District- North 24 Parganas, West Bengal- Pin- 743233, Present Correspondence Address At Post Box No. 16, Head Post Office, Bilaspur,-495001, Chhattisgarh, (Hereinafter Referred To As ''the Petitioner'') ... Petitioner versus 1 - The State Of Chhattisgarh Through Chief Secretary, Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Union Of India Through The Secretary, Ministry Of Railways, Rail Bhawan, New Delhi ... Respondents (Cause title, as taken from CIS system) Mr. Bibhas Das, Petitioner appears in person. For State/Respondent No.1 For UOI/Respondent No.2 : : Mr. Anadi Sharma, Panel Lawyer Mr. Rishabh Dev Singh, CGC on behalf of Mr. Ramakant Mishra, Dy. Solicitor General of India. (Hon’ble Shri Justice Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Order on Board 16/04/2026 1. Heard. 2. This petition has been preferred by petitioner under Article 226 of the RUKHSAR BANO Digitally signed by RUKHSAR BANO Date: 2026.04.17 10:33:38 +0530 2 Constitution of India seeking following reliefs:- “I. Direct urgent and time-bound hearing of W.P.(C) No. 565/2025 and pending Interlocutory Applications; II. Fix the matter in a specific time slot / priority listing; III. Consider hearing even during holidays / non- working days / beyond regular court hours, if deemed appropriate; IV. Pass any other order deemed fit in the interest of justice.” 3. The reliefs sought by petitioner indicate that he wanted an early and expeditious hearing of his case bearing WPC No.565/2025. 4. Having considered the reliefs sought by petitioner, the Registry has raised an objection that the present petition is not maintainable. 5. A bare perusal of reliefs sought by petitioner shows that the objection raised by the Registry is appropriate. Therefore, the present writ petiton is dismissed at the threshold. However, if the petitioner wishes to make any prayer, he may do so in WPC No.565/2025 itself. 6. Accordingly, the present writ petition stands disposed of. 7. Pending interlocutory application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. No order as to cost(s). Sd/- (Naresh Kumar Chandravanshi) Judge Rukhsar