Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7032 (RAJ)

SULTAN S/O SHRI ISHWAR RAM v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/3753/2026 · 2026-05-13

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:20173] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 3753/2026 Sultan S/o Shri Ishwar Ram, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Ward No 9, Repaswalo Ki Dhani, Mandawara, Police Station Sadar Sikar District Sikar (Raj.) (At Present Confined In District Jail Sikar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Mamraj Jat Mr. Pushpendra Dutt Rundla For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 13/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.177/2025 registered at Police Station Gokulpura, District Sikar for offences under Sections 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 61(2), 303(2), 308(3), 3(5) and 351(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner have falsely been implicated in this case. He further submits that the only allegation against the present petitioner is that he had given some cash amount to the principal offender Phoolchand for the purchase of the disputed land and except that there is no specific role is attributed to him. He again submits principal offender Phoolchand has already been enlarged on bail by this [2026:RJ-JP:20173] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-3753/2026] Court on 12.01.2026. The case of the petitioner is on better footing. Therefore, on the ground of parity with the co-accused, the present petitioner is also entitled to the grant of bail. He is behind the bars since 30.01.2026 though two cases have been reported against him however in both cases he has already been acquitted. Charge-sheet has already been filed. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently the bail application deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sultan S/o Shri Ishwar Ram, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/19