FELIZIA JOYLANNE MARTINS AND 2 ORS v. UNION OF INDIA THR THE MINISTRY OF EXTERNAL AFFAIRS AND 2 ORS
WP/665/2026 · 2026-09-08
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7031 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7031 (BOM) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
68 WP 665 2026
8th September, 2026
vinita IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.665 OF 2026
1 Miss. Felizia Joylanne Martins, Age-15, Indian national,
2 Mast. Feliciano Cajetan Martins, Age- 26, Indian national,
3 Miss. Jazzlyn Velanka Martins, Age-6 Indian national, All represented through their Natural Guardian Mother Mrs. Felcy Anunciacao Ferrao and all Resident of House No. 1509/2, Felix Nest Rego Bagh, Alto Santa Cruz, Bambolim North Goa.
…
Petitioners.
Versus
1 Union of India, Through the Ministry of External Affairs New Delhi.
2 The Regional Passport Officer Ministry of External Affairs Regional Passport Office, Panaji Goa.
3 Mr. Joyston Alexius Martins, Son of Mr. Joaquim Martins, Age about 34 years, Resident of H.No. 20/333/A, Kevnem, Caranzalem, Goa. Pincode-403002 Presently residing at Joyston Martins, LE5 4EA, Leceister England. Email :- Joystonm36@gmail.com Ph. No.:- +447438861261
…
Respondents.
Mr. Vithal Naik, Advocate for the Petitioners. Mr. Pravin N. Faldessai, Deputy Solicitor General of India for the
68 WP 665 2026
8th September, 2026
Respondent No. 1. Mr. Joyston Alexius Martins, Respondent No. 3 present through VC.
CORAM:- VALMIKI MENEZES & AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, JJ. DATED :- 8th September, 2026
JUDGMENT ( Per Valmiki Menezes,J).
1. Leave to amend the cause title for the purpose of correcting the age of Petitioner No. 2. The amendment shall be carried out forthwith.
2. Heard learned Counsel for the Parties.
3. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith with the consent of the
learned Counsel for the Respondent No.1 and Respondent No.3 in person through VC.
4. Mr P. Faldessai, learned Deputy Solicitor General of India waives notice on behalf of Respondent No.1.
5. Respondent No. 3 has been served with notice of this Court by email. He has appeared through Video Conferencing (VC), as he is presently in Leicester, United Kingdom. Respondent No.3 states that he has no objection if the Passport Officer issues passports in favour of the three Petitioners, who are all his children. He further submits that he shall communicate his
68 WP 665 2026
8th September, 2026
consent in writing by email directly to the office of the Passport Officer at the email address mentioned at page 13 of the Petition.
6. In view of the fact that the father of the Petitioners, who is Respondent No. 3, has now conveyed his consent for the issuance of passports, there is no impediment to the Passport Officer processing the applications submitted by the three Petitioners and issuing the passports. The Passport Officer shall, preferably, process the applications and issue the passports within a period of two weeks from today.
7. With the aforesaid directions, the Petition stands disposed of. Rule is made absolute in the above terms.
8. The Writ Petition stands disposed of accordingly.
AMIT S. JAMSANDEKAR, J. VALMIKI MENEZES, J.
Signed by: VINITA VIKAS NAIK Designation: Private Secretary Date: 09/09/2026 12:10:40