Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7028 (RAJ)

BHURARAM CHOUDHARY S/O LATE SHRI GANGARAM CHOUDHARY v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMP/1044/2024 · 2026-05-11

Anoop Kumar Dhand

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19837] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 1044/2024 Bhuraram Choudhary S/o Late Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Aged About 46 Years, Resident Of 143-A, Doctor Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Prithviraj Nagar, Gopalpura Byepass Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Assistant Commissioner Of Police, Jaipur City (South), Commissionerate, Government Hostel Circle, Jaipur, Rajasthan. 3. S.h.o. Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South), Rajasthan. ----Respondents Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2494/2022 Sunil Kumar Gupta S/o Shri Chhitarmal Gupta, Aged About 40 Years, R/o Reengus Road, Ward No. 9, Near Chungi Naka, Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Bhoora Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 143-A, Doctor Rajendra Prasad Nagar, Prathvi Raj Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous (Petition) No. 2650/2022 Suresh Kumar Gupta S/o Late Shri Bhanwar Mal Gupta, Aged About 54 Years, R/o Ward No. 9 , New Colony, Near Fire Brigade Centre, Reengus Road, Chomu, District Jaipur. ----Petitioner Versus 1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor. 2. Bhoora Ram Choudhary S/o Shri Gangaram Choudhary, Aged About 44 Years, R/o 143-A, Doctor Rajendra Prasad [2026:RJ-JP:19837] (2 of 3) [CRLMP-1044/2024] Nagar, Prathvi Raj Nagar, Ajmer Road, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Jai Kishan Yogi Mr. Ashish Gauringa For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jitendra Singh Rathore, PP Ms. Seema Shekhar JUSTICE ANOOP KUMAR DHAND Order 11/05/2026 1. The S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.2494/2022 and 2650/2022 have been submitted by the accused-petitioners for quashing the impugned FIR No.51/2021 registered with the Police Station Shyam Nagar, District Jaipur City (South) for the offences punishable under Sections 420, 406 and 120B IPC. While the S.B. Criminal Misc. Petition No.1044/2024 has been submitted by the complainant-petitioner for issuing directions to the Investigating Officer to conduct fair and impartial investigation of the aforesaid case. 2. At the very outset, learned Public Prosecutor apprised this Court on the basis of the factual report dated 14.04.2026 received from the Station House Officer, Shyam Nagar, Jaipur (South) that after investigation, the Police has found the instant case is of civil nature and has proposed Final Report (Negative). He further submits that the matter is still awaiting orders of the Commissioner of Police and immediately after receiving the orders of the Commissioner of Police, appropriate report would be submitted before the concerned Court. [2026:RJ-JP:19837] (3 of 3) [CRLMP-1044/2024] 3. Considering the contents of the factual report and looking to the fact that after investigation, the Police has found the present matter as civil in nature, all the instant criminal misc. petitions have become infructuous. 4. Accordingly, all the instant criminal misc. petitions stand dismissed as having become infructuous. The stay application and all pending applications, if any, also stand dismissed. 5. The Investigating Officer is directed to submit conclusion report of the investigation before the concerned Court expeditiously, as early as possible. 6. In case, the Final Report (Negative) is submitted, the complainant-petitioner would be at liberty to avail the remedies available to him under the law. In case, Final Report (Negative) is not submitted, the petitioners would be at liberty to move an application for revival of the instant petitions. (ANOOP KUMAR DHAND),J KuD/49-51