Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 70254 (MAD)

Raja v. State rep by The Inspector of Police

CRL OP/2981/2026 · 2026-02-09

K Rajasekar

Transfer Petitionbody2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED: 09-02-2026 CORAM THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE K.RAJASEKAR CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 1. Raja S/o. Selvaraj,Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308. 2. Adhi @ Adhikesavan S/o. Nagappan, No.19, Padavettamman Koil Street, V aiyavur Village and Post, Madhuranthagam Taluk, Chengalpattu District -603 308. 3. SekarS/o. Vedhachalam,No.2, 3rd Street, Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk, Chengalpattu District -603 308 4. Suresh S/o. Padavattan,No.7, Padavettamman Koil __________ Page1 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 5. Elumalai S/o. Srinivasan,No.21, Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam TalukChengalpattu District -603 308 6. Kuppas @ Kuppan S/o. Gubendiran,No.14, Cross Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 7. Moorthy S/o. Srinivasan,No.21, Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 8. Siva S/o. Munusamy,No.2 Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 __________ Page2 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 9. Satheesh @ Satheeshkumar S/o. Kalidass,No.12, Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 10. Allimuthu s/o. Kalidass,No.12 Padavettamman Koil Street,Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 11. Yakkesh @ Yakkesh Kumar S/o Ezhumalai No.1/A 3rd Street, Vaiyavur Village and Post,Madhuranthagam Taluk,Chengalpattu District -603 308 12. Kalyani 13. Sivaranjani 14. Bama @ Sathiya Bama 15. Velankanni 16. Vennila 17. Vani __________ Page3 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 18. Ammu ..Petitioner(s) Vs State rep by The Inspector of Police Padalam Police Station. Chengalpattu District. (Crime No. 30 of 2026) ..Respondent(s) Prayer : This petition is filed under section 482 of BNSS to enlarge the petitioners on bail in the event of their arrest by the Respondent police concerned in Crime No.30 of 2026 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Padalam Police station, Chengalpattu District or on their appearance before the court and thus render justice. For Petitioner(s): A Murugavel A.Murugavel G. Jayakumar C. Pushparaj For Respondent(s): Ms.J.R. Archana, Govt Advocate( Crl side) __________ Page4 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 ORDER The petitioner, who apprehends arrest for the alleged offence under Sections 191(2), 304(2), 324(2) of BNS Act in Crime No.30 of 2026 on the file of the respondent police seeks anticipatory bail. 2.The case of the prosecution is that the petitioners herein joined hands with other accused and demolished the house and compound wall of the defacto complainant. Hence, the complaint. 3.The learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submitted that the place where the house was constructed is a common pathway and the defacto complainant has put up the construction in that area. Hence they have raised objection to put up the construction. Hence, he prays to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) appearing for the respondent police reiterated the prosecution case and produced the copy of the proceedings issued by the concerned BDO wherein, it was stated that the subject area is a private land and it belongs to a private party and the petitioners herein have demolished the construction put up in that area. Hence he opposed for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. __________ Page5 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 5. Heard both sides and perused the materials available on record. 6. Considering the submissions made by both sides and the fact that the place where the construction was put up was a private land and the petitioners knowing well about the same has demolished the construction and caused loss to the defacto complainant , I am not inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 7. Accordingly, this Criminal Original Petition is dismissed. 09.02.2026 smn To 1. The Judicial Magistrate Court- Kunnam, Perambalur District. 2. The Inspector of Police, Kunnam Police Station,Perambalur District. 3.The Public Prosecutor High Court of Madras, Chennai 600 104. __________ Page6 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 K.RAJASEKAR, J. smn CRL OP No. 2981 of 2026 09-02-2026 __________ Page7 of 7 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis