Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7024 (RAJ)

MUSTAK KHAN S/O BHAMBAD @ BHAMMAD v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/7619/2026 · 2026-05-19

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21063] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7619/2026 1. Mustak Khan S/o Bhambad @ Bhammad, Aged About 35 Years, R/o Nagla Aramsingh Police Station Kaithwada, District Deeg. (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg). 2. Robin Khan S/o Muhar Khan @ Muhur Khan, Aged About 24 Years, R/o Jeewanbas Police Station Khoh District Deeg. (At Present Confined In District Jail Deeg). ----Petitioners Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Abhinav Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 19/05/2026 1. The petitioners have filed this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.129/2025 registered at Police Station Sikari, District Deeg for offences under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340(2), 317(2), 317(4), 317(5), 303(2), 111(2)(a), 313, 61(2) of BNS, 2023 and Section 66D of IT Act. 2. Heard learned counsels for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. He again submits that petitioners have not been named in the FIR. Co-accused Fida Hussain, Wajid, Irfan, Ajruddeen who were named in the FIR have enlarged on bail by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order [2026:RJ-JP:21063] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-7619/2026] dated 28.07.2025. Other co-accused Hasim and Lakkhi Khan have been enlarged on bail by this Court on 28.04.2026 and 06.03.2026 respectively. The case of the petitioners are on better footing. Petitioners are behind the bars since 04.05.2026 without any criminal past. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody and on the ground of parity with other co-accused, the bail application of the petitioners may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in the light of submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Mustak Khan S/o Bhambad @ Bhammad and Robin Khan S/o Muhar Khan @ Muhur Khan, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/76