Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7020 (BOM)

MAHARASHTRA STATE ROAD TRANSPORT CORPORATION THR. DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. YASHWANT RAMCHANDRA SHEWALE

IA/818/2026 · 2026-09-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

29-IA-818-2026=.doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 818 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 4858 OF 2026 WITH FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 4858 OF 2026 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Thr. Divisional Controller … Applicant Vs. Yashwant Ramchandra Shewale … Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 820 OF 2026 IN FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 4861 OF 2026 WITH FIRST APPEAL (ST) NO. 4861 OF 2026 Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation Thr. Divisional Controller … Applicant Vs. Yashwant Ramchandra Shewale and Anr. … Respondents …………. Mr. Shubham S. Dhoble i/b D.D. Rananaware for the Applicant Mr. Kalpesh U. Patil for the Respondents. …………. CORAM : SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. DATE : 7th SEPTEMBER, 2026. P. C. : I.A. NO. 818 OF 2026 & I.A. NO. 820 OF 2026 . The applicant seeks to condone the delay of 180 and 182 days Uday S. Jagtap 1 of 2 UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Digitally signed by UDAY SHIVAJI JAGTAP Date: 2026.09.08 13:14:53 +0530 29-IA-818-2026=.doc respectively in the appeals preferred challenging the judgment and award passed by the Tribunal. 2. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents opposes the applications. 3. The delay has been properly explained. The contents of the applications have not been controverted. The delay is not intentional. 4. For the reasons stated in the application, the applications are allowed and the delay stands condoned. F. A. (ST) NO. 4858 OF 2026 & F.A. (ST) NO. 4861 OF 2026 5. Admit. 6. Call for record and proceedings. 7. Print is dispensed with. 8. The parties shall be at liberty to file a private paper book. ( SHAILESH P. BRAHME, J. ) Uday S. Jagtap 2 of 2