G. Raja Gopal Reddy v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/18458/2026 · 2026-07-21
K Sreenivasa Reddy
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7019 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7019 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
1
APHC010340342026
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction)
WEDNESDAY, THE 22nd DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K SREENIVASA REDDY WRIT PETITION NO: 18458 OF 2026 Between:
1. G. Raja Gopal Reddy, S/o.Narayana Reddy, Aged 49 years, Occ Contractor, R/o.H.No. 2-11, Singanapalli Village, Owk Mandal, Nandyal District-518122 ...Petitioner AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, Rep. by Principal Secretary, Panchayat Raj and Rural Water Supply and sanitation Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi - 522 237
2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, Department of Finance and Planning, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur District -522 237. 3. The District Collector, Nandyal, Nandyal District - 518501
2
4. The Superintending Engineer FAC, RWS and S Cfrcle, Kumool, Kumool District
5. The Executive Engineer, RWS and S(f) Division, Nandyal, Nandyal District - 518501. ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to direct respondents to return the Security deposit (EMD and FSD) amounts of Rs. 1,80,000/- to the petitioner forthwith, pending disposal of the main writ petition and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2026 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the respondent Nos: 4 and 5 not to harass the petitioners by calling them repeatedly to the respondent 4 and 5 police stations, without appropriate notice or proceeding, pending disposal of the above writ petition pending disposal of the above writ petition and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: D SESHASAYANA REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR REVENUE Counsel for the Respondents:GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following order:
3
4
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.18458 OF 2026 ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief:
“….this Hon'ble Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in not returning the security deposit(EMD and FSD) amounts to the petitioner for an amount of Rs.
1,80,000/-in pursuance of the work Construction of 40KL OHSR in Ramapuram (V) Owk(M) and Augmentations of single village Scheme to SC locality of Kalavatala(V) Kolimigundla (M) for work done by me under MPLADS & GP funds in Kurnool District, in pursuance of the agreements entered into with the respondents is illegal, arbitrary and contrary to law, violation of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to return the Security deposit (EMD and FSD) amounts of Rs1,80,000/- to the petitioner forthwith and to pass such other order or orders…. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development appearing for the respondents. 5
3. Case of the petitioner is that he is a contractor undertaking civil works in Kurnool District. Pursuant to contracts awarded under MPLADS and GP Funds for construction of a 40 KL OHSR at Ramapuram Village, Owk Mandal, and augmentation of the Single Village Scheme to the SC locality of Kalavatala Village, Kolimigundla Mandal, he completed the works within the stipulated time. According to the petitioner, the respondent authorities released the final bills after due quality checks but failed to refund an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- towards Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and Further Security Deposit (FSD), though the same ought to have been released along with the final bills. 4. It is the case of the petitioner that, despite submitting representations requesting release of the security deposit amounts, the respondents have not taken any action. Alleging that the respondents are illegally withholding the security deposit without any authority of law, the petitioner has filed the present writ petition seeking a direction to the respondents to refund the amount of Rs.1,80,000/- along with consequential reliefs. 6
5. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, on written instructions, from the Executive Engineer, RWS & S(P) Division, Nandyal- 5threspondent, submits that there is no dispute with regard to the execution of the subject works by the petitioner. He further submits that the petitioner is entitled to an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- towards Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and Further Security Deposit (FSD), and that proposals for release of grant were submitted to the authorities concerned, and sought time for payment of the said amount. The written instructions are placed on record. 6.
Having regard to the fact that there is no dispute with regard to the works executed by the petitioner and an amount of Rs.1,80,000/- towards Earnest Money Deposit (EMD) and Further Security Deposit (FSD) payable to him, and in view of the submissions of the learned Assistant Government Pleader for Panchayat Raj and Rural Development, the respondent authorities are directed to pay a sum of Rs.1,80,000/- to the petitioner within a period of six (6) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. 7
7. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, interlocutory applications pending if any, shall stand closed. _______________________ K.SREENIVASA REDDY, J
Date: 22.07.2026. PAB
8
THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE K.SREENIVASA REDDY
WRIT PETITION NO.18458 OF 2026
DATE: 22.07.2026
PAB