Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7018 (CHH)

GIRDHARI PATEL v. STATE OF CHHATTISGARH

WPS/4208/2022 · 2026-04-15

Shri Rakesh Mohan Pandey

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2026:CGHC:17446 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 4208 of 2022 * - Girdhari Patel S/o Shri Harishankar Patel Aged About 32 Years R/o PO. Kotami, Tehsil Dhabra, District Janjgri Champa, Chhattisgarh. ... Petitioner Versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Govt. Of Chahttisgarh, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, New Raipur, Atal Nagar, Chhattisgarh. 2 - The District Collector, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. 3 - The Chief Medical And Health Officer, District Raigarh, Chhattisgarh. ... Respondents For Petitioner : Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, Advocate holding the brief of Mr. Sangeet Kumar Kushwaha, Advocate For Respondents/State : Mr. Abhishek Singh, Panel Lawyer Hon’ble Shri Justice Rakesh Mohan Pandey Order on Board 16/04/2026 1. The petitioner has filed this petition seeking the following relief(s):- “10.1 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this present writ petition and direct the Respondents to produce the entire records pertaining to present case for its kind perusal. 10.2 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to Respondent no. 3 thereby quashing the impugned termination order vide letter dated 31.05.2022. 10.3 That, this Hon’ble Court may kindly issue an appropriate writ/order/direction to Respondent No. 3 to reinstate the Petitioner in service as per his appointment order. Digitally signed by RAMESH KUMAR VATTI Date: 2026.04.17 11:19:36 +0530 2 10.4 That, any other relief which this Hon’ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case may also be awarded in the favour of the petitioner. 10.5 That, the cost of the petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner” 2. At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that by efflux of time, the present petition has become infructuous, therefore, this petition may be dismissed being rendered infructuous. 3. No objection from other side. 4. Recording the statement made by Mr. Sudhanshu Upadhyay, learned counsel appearing for the petitioner, this petition is dismissed being rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Rakesh Mohan Pandey) Judge vatti