FULENDRA KUMAR ALIAS AKSHAY v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./112/2026 · 2026-04-20
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7017 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7017 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:JHHC:11577] IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No.112 of 2026
------ Fulendra Kumar @ Akshay, aged about 33 years Son of Dharamdev Singh, Resident of Village- Sitalbagha, P.O. & P.S. Daudnagar, District- Aurangabad, Bihar.
.... .... …. Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand
.... .... .... Opposite Party
------
CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Gautam Kumar, Adv.
For the State : Mr. Rajesh Kumar, A.P.P.
------
Order No.04 Dated- 20-04-2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Sessions Trial No. 320 of 2025 arising out of Chas P.S. Case No. 99 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 309(4) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and Section 27 of the Arms Act.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner has committed the offence of dacoity from the jewelry shop of the informant. It is next submitted that in the meanwhile both the informant and his gate keeper who are the two eye witnesses of the occurrence, have been examined as P.W. 3 and P.W.2 respectively but neither of them could identify the petitioner; who was produced through video conferencing during examination of P.W. 3 and P.W.2 as witnesses. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has no criminal antecedent. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 01.07.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 01 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the
case in any manner during the trial of the case.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of learned Additional Sessions Judge-III, Bokaro, in connection with Sessions Trial No. 320 of 2025 arising out of Chas P.S. Case No. 99 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the informant or the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 20/04/2026 Amar/-