KANUGALA RAMUDU v. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER / COLLECTOR
CRP/340/2023 · 2026-07-23
Subba Reddy Satti
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7015 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7015 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010068142023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3331] FRIDAY, THE 24th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 340/2023 Between:
1. KANUGALA RAMUDU, S/O RANGASWAMY, AGED 46 YEARS, OCC.
CULTIVATION, R/O S.C. COLONY, SAKUNALA VILLAGE, ORVAKAL MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT.
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER / COLLECTOR, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, KURNOOL DISTRICT. RESPONDENT/ RESPONDENT NO. 1
2. VADLAMUDI ANANDAIAH, S/O V. EJERAIAH, AGED 70 YEARS, R/O D NO. 12-69, OBULAIAH NAGAR, NEAR S.B.H, B-CAMP, KURNOOL.
...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India,praying that in the circumstances stated in the grounds filed herein,the High Court may be pleased to urged at the time of final hearing the petitioner prays the Honble Court that the impugned order is liable to be set aside and to allow the application I.A.No. 47/2022 in LAOP No.49/2020 dated 04-11-2022 IA NO: 1 OF 2023 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay of all further proceedings in L.A.O.P No.49/2020 on the file of the Presiding Officer (Judge), the Land Acquisition, Rehabilitation And Resettlement Authority, Tirupati Region, Tirupati or else I will suffer grave and irreparable loss and pass
Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. D KRISHNA MURTHY Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1.
2. CHALLA SIVASANKAR The Court made the following:
::ORDER ::
Sri Sri Harsha, learned counsel representing Sri D. Krishna Murthy,
learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the cause in the civil revision petition does not survive for adjudication and the same has become infructuous.
2. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No
order as to costs. As a sequel, pending miscellaneous petitions, if any, shall stand closed.
___________________________ JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI Date: 24.07.2026 TVN
Whether the order is : Speaking Yes/No / Reasoned Yes/No Reportable Yes/No / Non-Reportable Yes/No
21 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE SUBBA REDDY SATTI
CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO: 340 of 2023
Date: 24.07.2026 TVN