Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7014 (BOM)

SWAYAM MAYAPPA PADALKAR v. STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR.

ABA/457/2026 · 2026-09-08

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

905-ABA-457-2026 (CR).docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLN. NO. 457 OF 2026 Swayam Mayappa Padalkar … Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra & Anr. … Respondents —————— Mr. Jitendra A. More for the Applicant. Ms. S.N. Deshmukh, A.P.P. for the Respondent-State. Officer : API Ms. Shital Kumar Gaikwad, Vijapur Naka Police Station, present. —————— Coram : ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. Date : 8th September 2026. PER COURT : 1. Heard Mr. Jitendra More, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State. 2. By the present Application under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, the Applicant has sought for the following substantive relief : “b) The Applicant prays before this Hon'ble Court to in the event of arrest of the Applicant in connection with C.R. No.374 of 2026 registered with Vijapur Naka Police Station, Solapur, for the offences punishable under Sections 310(2), 115(2), 352 and 351(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, direct that osk 1 of 2 905-ABA-457-2026 (CR).docx the Applicant be released on bail on such terms and conditions as this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper.” 3. This matter was heard on 17th August 2026 and 24th August 2026. 4. Ms. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State submits that the Applicant has not cooperated with the investigation. 5. After having heard the matter for some time, Mr. Jitendra More, learned Advocate for the Applicant sought a pass over to take instructions from the Applicant. After some time, at the request of Mr. Jitendra More, learned Advocate for the Applicant, this Application was taken up. 6. Mr. Jitendra More, learned Advocate for the Applicant, on instructions from the Applicant, seeks leave to withdraw the present Anticipatory Bail Application. This request is not opposed by Ms. Deshmukh, learned A.P.P. for the Respondents-State. 7. In view of the statement made by Mr. Jitendra More, learned Advocate for the Applicant, leave is granted to withdraw the present Anticipatory Bail Application. 8. Anticipatory Bail Application No. 457 of 2026 is dismissed as withdrawn. [ ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J. ] osk 2 of 2 OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Digitally signed by OMKAR SHIVAHAR KUMBHAKARN Date: 2026.09.08 19:43:35 +0530