Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7012 (ORI)

NAIMISH BEHERA v. STATE OF ODISHA

BLAPL/2530/2026 · 2026-04-27

V Narasingh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK BLAPL No.2530 of 2026 Naimish Behera …. Petitioner Mr. K. Mohanty, Advocate -versus- State of Odisha …. Opposite Party Mr. C.R. Swain, AGA CORAM: JUSTICE V. NARASINGH Order No. ORDER 27.04.2026 01. 1. Heard learned counsel for the Petitioner and learned counsel for the State. 2. The Petitioner is an accused in connection with C.T. (Spl.) Case No. 06 of 2026, pending in the Court of learned Special Judge, Bargarh, arising out of Bargarh Town P.S. Case No. 48 of 2026, for commission of alleged offences U/s. 21(c) /25/ 29 of NDPS Act, 1985. 3. Learned counsel, on instruction, submits that except the present BLAPL, no other bail application of the Petitioner relating to the aforementioned P.S. Case is pending in any other Court. 4. Being aggrieved by the rejection of his application for bail U/s. 483 of the BNSS by the p. 2 learned Special, Judge, Baragarh by order dated 06.03.2026, the present BLAPL has been filed. 5. The allegation against the Petitioners is that they along with other co-accused are involved in transportation of 10 Nos. of PP Woven sacks containing 505 numbers of sealed Eskuf Cough Sryup in each sack, all total 5050 bottles of Eskuf Cough Syrup which is allegedly contains 1.01 kg. of Codeine Phosphate. 6. Learned counsel for the State opposes the prayer for bail. 7. Considering the nature of allegations, this Court directs the Petitioners to be released on bail on such terms to be fixed by the learned Court in seisin subject to verification of criminal antecedent. 8. If it comes to fore that the Petitioners have criminal antecedent of similar nature, this order shall not be given effect to. 9. Accordingly, the BLAPL stands disposed of. U.C.C as per rules. (V. NARASINGH) Judge Soumya Designation: Jr. Stenographer