Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7011 (UTT)

SANDEEP ANEJA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/3162/2018 · 2026-06-16

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4908 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS/3162/2018 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. There is no representation for the petitioner. 2. Mr. B.D. Bisen, Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State/respondent nos. 1 & 2. 3. Mr. Kartikeya Naithani, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Vipul Sharma, Advocate for respondent no. 3. 4. Mr. Sanjay Bhatt, Advocate for respondent no. 4. 5. Petitioner was debarred from participating in election for the office of Nagar Pramukh/ Up Nagar Pramukh/ Sabhasad, vide order dated 20.09.2018, passed by Secretary, Urban Development Department, Uttarakhand, which is under challenge in this writ petition. 6. Learned State Counsel submits that the four years’ period for which petitioner was debarred from contesting election is now over, therefore, the relief claimed in the writ petition do not survive. 7. This Court finds substance in the said submission. Since the order impugned was passed in 2018, therefore four years’ period would have come to an end in 2022. Thus, the relief as claimed do not survive. 8. The writ petition is, therefore, dismissed as infructuous. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.06.2026 Navin NAVEEN CHANDRA Digitally signed by NAVEEN CHANDRA DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3be23325146e76a0642bdf4943fb9046f487df006da82a131bb4e4403d3 c0a15, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=18167EEFB5CA8CFFD421A103819DA875643AF56D653D095C6ED 9A86DAAB21CE5, cn=NAVEEN CHANDRA Date: 2026.06.17 09:59:30 +05'30'