Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 7010 (BOM)

VIMAL BHAU BHUSARE v. DIRECTOR OF MARKETING INDIAN OIL CORPORATION LTD AND ORS

WP/628/2026 · 2026-09-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

35-WP-628-2026(C).doc IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIRCUIT BENCH AT KOLHAPUR CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 628 OF 2026 Vimal Bhau Bhusare ...Petitioner Versus Director Of Marketing Indian Oil Corporation Ltd And Ors. ...Respondents —————— Mr. Machindra Patil, for the Petitioner. Mr. Siddheshwar B. Kalel, AGP for the Respondent-State. —————— CORAM : SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH & NEERAJ P. DHOTE, JJ. DATE : SEPTEMBER 07, 2026. P. C. : 1. By the present Petition, the Petitioner seeks to challenge the allotment of the Retail Outlet Dealership to Respondent No. 3 on the ground that the caste certificate which has been submitted by Respondent No.3 is a fabricated document, by relying upon a communication by the Tahsildar, Baitul, that it does not have the record of the caste certificate being issued. The issue in the present petition would involve disputed questions of fact as regards the issuance of the caste certificate by the Tahsildar, Baitul, and the consequent allotment based on the same. We are not inclined to entertain the petition in view of such disputed questions of facts. Jamadar-SL 1 of 2 2026:BHC-KOL:8621-DB 35-WP-628-2026(C).doc 2. The petition is disposed of with liberty to the petitioner to adopt appropriate proceedings. [NEERAJ P. DHOTE, J.] [SHARMILA U. DESHMUKH, J.] Jamadar-SL 2 of 2