SURENDRA SINGH ALIAS KHINNU S/O TEJ SINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLMB/5172/2026 · 2026-05-01
Ashok Kumar Jain
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7008 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 7008 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:18673] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal 2nd Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 5172/2026 Surendra Singh Alias Khinnu S/o Tej Singh, Aged About 27 Years, R/o Ward No 11, Badau, Police Station Khetri Nagar, District Jhunjhunu, Rajasthan. (Presently Accused Is Confined In Jail, Jhunjhunu). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Pragya Pandey Mr. Nirmal Solaki For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vijay Singh Yadav, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK KUMAR JAIN
Order 01/05/2026
1. This instant second application for bail filed under Section 483 of BNSS by the applicant-accused Surendra Singh @ Khinnu S/o Tej Singh in FIR No.19/2025 dated 06.02.2025 registered at P.S. Khetri Nagar, District - Jhunjhunu, whereby the applicant-accused has charged under Section 333, 324(6), 308(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS.
2.
Learned counsel for the applicant relying upon grounds raised in bail application submits that the applicant is innocent and falsely implicated in the present case. Further he submitted that the investigation relating to present applicant-accused is complete and is no more required by the Investigating Agency for investigation. He further assures that in case, the applicant- accused is required for further investigation, the applicant-accused
[2026:RJ-JP:18673] (2 of 4) [CRLMB-5172/2026] will be available for such investigation. He also submitted that the investigation/trial will take its own time and no purpose will be served by keeping the applicant-accused in custody.
3.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the complainant has already entered into compromise and the same was attested on 23.03.2026. He also submitted that the complainant was examined prior to compromise, but the complainant has specifically made a statement that he does not want any proceeding against the petitioner. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes not to repeat any offence.
4. Aforesaid contentions were opposed by the learned Public Prosecutor, and he submitted that as per the bail cancellation
order, five criminal cases were registered against the petitioner.
5. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material placed on record.
6. On the basis of report lodged by complainant Ganga Singh about demand of ransom by Surendra, Sohan and Sonu and further assault with deadly weapons in the night of 06.02.2025, FIR No.19/2025 registered at P.S. Khetri Nagar, Jhunjhunu on 06.02.2025 under Sections 333, 324(6), 308(2), 351(2), 3(5) of BNS. After investigation, this petitioner was arrested and now he is in custody. The police has filed charge-sheet against Sonu, Sohan and Surendra. Two accused Sohan and Sonu were already granted benefit of bail by a Co-ordinate Bench of this Court by
order dated 19.02.2025. The criminal antecedent submitted by learned Public Prosecutor indicated 6 more criminal cases were registered against this petitioner at different police station of different districts.
[2026:RJ-JP:18673] (3 of 4) [CRLMB-5172/2026]
7. The material on record indicates that the complainant has filed compromise on 11.03.2026 and the same was attested on
23.03.2026. After attestation of compromise, the petitioner was acquitted from charge under Sections 351(2) and 3(5) of BNS. Now, charge under Sections 333, 324 (6), and 308(2) of BNS is pending against the petitioner, and statement of the victim was recorded as PW-2 on 23.09.2025 wherein he admitted that he has not suffered any injury.
8. Upon hearing the arguments and perusing the record, we have found that the applicant-accused is no more required in the investigation and he is in custody for quite some time. The further proceedings will take its own time, therefore, looking to entirety of
facts and circumstances of the case and without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, the Court deems it appropriate to grant bail to the applicant-accused.
9. Thus, the instant bail application filed on behalf of applicant- accused Surendra Singh Alias Khinnu S/o Tej Singh, is hereby allowed and the applicant-accused is ordered to be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond of ₹50,000/- with two sureties of like amount to the satisfaction of the Trial Court with the following conditions:- (i) The applicant-accused shall not tamper with
evidence or influence the witness in any manner. (ii) The applicant-accused shall not indulge in any criminal activity and shall not repeat any criminal offence punishable under the Law.
[2026:RJ-JP:18673] (4 of 4) [CRLMB-5172/2026] (iii) The applicant-accused shall attend the hearing of the Trial Court on the date fixed by the Trial court or as and when asked to appear before the Trial Court. (iv) The petitioner shall mark his presence (attendance) at PS Khetri Nagar on every Monday, who shall forward the attendance to the concerned trial Court. (v) In case of any violation of above conditions, the bail granted to the applicant-accused shall be liable to be canceled.
10. The Registry is directed to send a copy of this order to the Trial Court through E-mail.
(ASHOK KUMAR JAIN),J PREETI VALECHA /37