Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6998 (KAR)

A. S. PRASANNA v. STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/6043/2019 · 2026-03-13

M I Arun

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15696 WP No. 6043 of 2019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF MARCH, 2026 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN WRIT PETITION NO.6043 OF 2019 (LB-RES) BETWEEN: 1. A.S. PRASANNA S/O. A.P. SATYANARAYAN, PRESIDENT, YALAGATVALLI GRAM PANCHAYAT, ARKALGUD TALUK, HASSAN DISTRICT, (NOW REMOVED FROM PANCHAYAT MEMBERSHIP AS PER IMPUGNED ORDER) AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, R/AT C/O. A.P. SATYANARAYANA, AJJUR POST, ARKALAGUDU TALUK, HASSAN-573 102. …PETITIONER [BY SRI. T.H. AVIN, ADVOCATE (ABSENT)] AND: 1. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF RURAL DEVELOPMENT AND PANCHAYAT RAJ, II STAGE, 3RD FLOOR, M.S. BUILDING, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BENGALURU-560 001. Digitally signed by GEETHA P G Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15696 WP No. 6043 of 2019 2. CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT, HASSAN DISTRICT, HASSAN-573 201. 3. EXECUTIVE OFFICER ARKALGUD TALUK PANCHAYAT, ARKALGUD, HASSAN-573 102. …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. CHANDINI S., HCGP., FOR R.1; SRI. A. NAGARAJAPPA, ADVOCATE FOR R.2 AND R.3.) THIS W.P. IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER BEARING NO.GRAAPA/161/GRAPAMA/2018 DATED 28.01.2019 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 (ANNEXURE- F); ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN 'B' GROUP THROUGH PHYSICAL HEARING/VIDEO CONFERENCING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.I.ARUN - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15696 WP No. 6043 of 2019 ORAL ORDER 1. Learned counsel for the petitioner is absent. 2. The writ petition is filed with a prayer to set aside the impugned order passed by respondent No.1, vide Annexure-F to the writ petition, whereby the petitioner has been disqualified from his membership of Yalagatvalli Gram Panchayat. 3. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that the petitioner was functioning as the President of Yalagatvalli Gram Panchayat. On the ground that he was involved in misappropriation of funds, the proceedings were initiated against him and the orders have been passed under Sections 43A and 48 of the Karnataka Gram Swaraj and Panchayat Raj Act, 1993. It is submitted that the impugned order was passed on 28.01.2019. It is further submitted that subsequent to passing of the impugned order, the elections have been conducted in respect of the Yalagatvalli Gram Panchayat and also to the post of the President in the said Gram Panchayat. It is also submitted that the impugned order - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2026:KHC:15696 WP No. 6043 of 2019 will have the effect of disqualifying the petitioner for a period of six years from the date of its passing and the said period has also lapsed. For that reason, it is submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. 4. For the aforementioned reasons, the writ petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. Sd/- (M.I.ARUN) JUDGE hkh. List No.: 1 Sl No.: 83