Research › Search › Judgment

Bombay High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6993 (BOM)

KASH FOODS PVT LTD THRU. DIRECTOR v. ASSISTANT REGISTRAR C S SRA MUMBAI AND ORS

WP/4656/2026 · 2026-09-07

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO. 4653 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4655 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4664 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4659 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4737 OF 2026 WITH WRIT PETITION NO. 4656 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26293 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION (ST) NO. 193 OF 2026 WITH INTERIM APPLICATION (ST) NO. 26295 OF 2026 IN WRIT PETITION NO. 50 OF 2026 Kash Foods Pvt Ltd Through Director ...Petitioner V/s. Assistant Registrar C.S. SRA Mumbai and Ors ...Respondents ________________ Page No. 1 of 2 7 SEPTEMBER 2026 2026:BHC-AS:36954 Renuka 11-WP-4653-2026.docx Mr. Prashant P. Kulkarni a/w. Ms. Rachana Mamnani and Ms. Ritika Rajeer for Petitioner Ms. Shyna Saheed i/b Vashi and Vashi for Respondent No. 2. Authorized Person Mr. Tanmay Mehta is present. ________________ CORAM: SANDEEP V. MARNE, J. DATED: 7 SEPTEMBER 2026. P.C.: 1) Writ Petition (Stamp) No. 50 of 2026 and Writ Petition No. 193 of 2026 are restored by recalling the office order dismissing the Petitions for non-removal of office objections. 2) In all the Petitions, parties have entered into amicable settlement. Consent terms are filed. Consent terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification in each of the Petitions. 3) Writ Petitions are accordingly disposed of in view of the consent terms. 4) Vakalatnama on behalf of the Respondent No. 2 in each Petitions are permitted to be filed within a period of two weeks. [SANDEEP V. MARNE, J.] Page No. 2 of 2 7 SEPTEMBER 2026