Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6987 (RAJ)

SACHIN SHAH S/O SHRI SUSHIL SHAH v. MUKANCHAND GOTHI S/O SHRI RAMLAL JI GOTHI

CW/7898/2026 · 2026-05-06

Maneesh Sharma

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:19233] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 7898/2026 1. Sachin Shah S/o Shri Sushil Shah, Aged About 40 Years 2. Shrenik Shah S/o Shri Sushil Shah, Aged About 35 Years Both R/o Shah Building, Chauda Rasta, Jaipur (Raj.) ----Petitioners Versus Mukanchand Gothi S/o Shri Ramlal Ji Gothi, Owner Of Kesrimal Mukanchand, Shah Market, Pali Bazaar (Shraddha Nand Bazaar) Beawar, R/o House No. 28, Gothi Bhawan, Kundan Bhawan Lane, Near Mahaveer Bazaar, Beawar (Raj.) ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanmay Dhand For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MANEESH SHARMA Order 06/05/2026 After arguing the matter at some length, and upon instruction from his client, learned counsel for the petitioner seeks permission to withdraw the present writ petition with liberty to seek expeditious hearing of the pending appeal. In view of the submissions made by learned counsel for the petitioner, the present writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty. While considering the fact that the rent and eviction petition was filed in the year 2016, and one of the grounds pleaded in the eviction petition, is bona fide necessity, the learned Appellate Rent Tribunal is directed to make an endeavor to decide the pending appeal No.82/2025 titled as 'Mukanchand Gothi Vs. Sachin Shah & Anr.' expeditiously, preferably within a period of six months [2026:RJ-JP:19233] (2 of 2) [CW-7898/2026] from the next date of hearing as service is complete and the record has already been received. All pending applications, if any, also stand disposed of. (MANEESH SHARMA),J Seema/74