PALLAVI KANSAL v. HARIDWAR ROORKEE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY
WPMS/1789/2026 · 2026-06-15
Manoj Kumar Tiwari
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6985 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6985 (UTT) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
2026:UHC:4796 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS
WPMS 1789/2026
Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.
Mr. Manish Lohani, Advocate, for the petitioner.
Mr. Mohd. Suhail, Advocate, i/b Mr. Sandeep Kothari, Advocate for the respondent no. 1 and 2.
(2) According to petitioner, on her complaint, proceedings were initiated against respondent no. 3 under Section 27(1) of Uttarkhand Urban and Country Planning & Development Act, 1973. Since those proceedings are continuing since 16.1.2025, therefore, petitioner has sought a direction to Secretary, Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority to expedite hearing of the said proceedings.
(3) Having regard to the facts and circumstances of the case, writ petition is
disposed of with a request to Secretary, Haridwar Roorkee Development Authority to make endeavour to decide the proceedings as early as possible, but not later than six months from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order.
(4) It goes without saying that person(s), likely to be affected by the decision to be taken, shall be provided reasonable opportunity of hearing before passing any order in the matter.
(Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.)
15.6.2026 Pr
PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3 aeab198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB5880 52DF6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.06.15 18:22:12 +05'30'
2026:UHC:4796