Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6985 (JHR)

UDAY PRASAD @ BABLU GUPTA ALIAS UDAY PRASAD GUPTA ALIAS BABLU GUPTA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3234/2026 · 2026-04-22

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2026:JHHC:11732 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3234 of 2026 ------ Uday Prasad @ Bablu Gupta @ Uday Prasad Gupta @ Bablu Gupta, aged about 44 years, s/o late Paras Nath Gupta, resident of Ward No.4, Madhushala Road, Hussainabad Road, P.O.-Japla, P.S.-Hussainabad, Dist.-Palamau … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Anil Kumar, Sr. Advocate : Ms. Chandana Kumari, Advocate : Mr. Atul Gera, Advocate For the State : Mr. Bhola N. Ojha, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 22.04.2026 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No.21 of 2026 registered for the offences punishable under Sections 3(5) of the BNS, 2023 and under Sections 20(b) (ii) (B), 25, 29 of the NDPS Act. Learned senior counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was in illegal possession of 3.085 Kgs of Ganja kept in four plastic bags for which recovery the wife of the petitioner namely Anita Devi has also been made accused. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is next submitted that from the house of Durga Devi, 4.259 Kgs of Ganja and from the house of the Savita Devi 2.992 kgs of Ganja was recovered. It is next submitted that the Ganja recovered comes under the intermediate quantity. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes that he will co-operate with the trial of the case. It is further submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 03.02.2026 as mentioned in para-06 of the instant bail application. It is lastly submitted that the co-accused person with similar allegation has already been admitted to bail by this Court vide order dated 08.04.2026 in B.A. No.2829 of 2026. Hence it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Special Judge, NDPS Act, Palamau in connection with Hussainabad P.S. Case No.21 of 2026 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) 22.04.2026 Gunjan-