Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6981 (UTT)

ATUL KUMAR BINDAL v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1521/2026 · 2026-06-15

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4768 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS 1521/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Abdul Ali, Advocate, i/b Mr. Bhupesh Kandpal, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Sudhir Nainwal, Standing Counsel, for the State. Mr. Akshay Pradhan, Advocate, for the respondent no. 2. Mr. B.D. Pande, Advocate, for the respondent no. 14. (2) Petitioner has challenged order dated 3.6.2025, passed by Assistant Collector, 1st Class/SDM, Sadar, Dehradun in Suit No. 36 of 2024-25. By the said order, parties to the partition suit have been restrained from alienating the land in question. Petitioner has also challenged the said order in a revision petition, filed under Section 333 of Zamindari Abolition and Land Reforms Act, and his revision petition, which is numbered as Revision No. 18 of 2025-26, is pending before Commissioner, Garhwal Division. (3) Since petitioner has challenged the same order in this writ petition which he has challenged in the aforesaid revision petition, therefore, writ petition is dismissed as petitioner cannot simultaneously maintain two proceedings against interim order dated 3.6.2025. (4) This Court hopes and expects that learned Revisional Court shall make endeavour to decide the revision as early as possible. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 15.6.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aea b198d462503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052D F6FCA58C67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.06.15 14:01:47 +05'30' 2026:UHC:4768