Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6981 (PNJ)

AMAN AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CRWP/4710/2026 · 2026-04-22

Manisha Batra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

CRWP-4710 IN THE (159) AMAN AND STATE OF H CORAM: Present: MANISHA B 1. Constitution o official respon the hands of representation 2. submitted tha 21.04.2026 be raising their gr not yet been c submitted that 4710-2026 (O&M) (1) THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB CHANDIGARH  D AND ANOTHER Versus OF HARYANA AND OTHERS HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MA Mr. Ravi Kumar Kherewal, Advo Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Haryan ****  HA BATRA, J. (ORAL) The present petition has been fi tion of India seeking issuance of a w respondent No.2 to protect the life an ds of respondents No.4 and 5 a tation dated 21.04.2026 (Annexure P At the very outset, learned co d that the petitioners have recentl 26 before the Superintendent of Po heir grievances as mentioned in the pr been considered and no action has b d that at this stage, the petitioners w NJAB AND HARYANA AT GARH CRWP-4710-2026 (O&M) Date of decision : 22.04.2026 ... Petitioners ...Respondents E MANISHA BATRA  , Advocate for the petitioners aryana een filed under Article 226 of the of a writ of mandamus directing the life and liberty of the petitioners at 5 and to take action on their ure P-7). ed counsel for the petitioners has recently filed a representation on of Police, Panipat (Annexure P-7) the present petition but the same has has been taken thereon. He further ners would be satisfied if appropriate f the g the rs at their has on 7) e has rther riate AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment. CRWP-4710 directions are i decide the af necessary actio 3. 4. behalf of the due course. Le course of the d 5. commenting a disposed of at aforesaid repre within a perio accordance w petitioners, the order to protec  22.04.2026 Amit Sharma 4710-2026 (O&M) (2) e issued to respondent No.2-Super the aforesaid representation filed b y action thereon. Notice of motion. Ms. Himani Arora, DAG, Hary f the respondents-State and submits th rse. Let a complete set of the paperboo f the day. In view of the limited prayer ma ting anything on the merits of the of at this stage with a direction to r d representation dated 21.04.2026 (An period of 15 days from today, by nce with law. Needless to say, if rs, the official respondents would pro protect their life and liberty. Whether speaking/reasoned:    Superintendent of Police, Panipat to filed by the petitioners and take , Haryana, has advance notice on mits that the needful will be done in erbook be supplied to her during the yer made by the petitioners, without f the case, the present petition is on to respondent No.2 to decide the 26 (Annexure P-7) of the petitioners y, by passing a speaking order in ay, if any threat is found to the ld provide them adequate security in (MANISHA BATRA) JUDGE  ed:- Yes/No   at to take e on ne in g the thout n is e the ners er in the ity in AMIT SHARMA 2026.04.23 09:47 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.