Page No.# 1/4 GAHC010085582026 undefined THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : MC/26/2026 M/S MEGHALAYA TRADING COMPANY AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 10TH MILE, P.O. BYRNIHAT, DIST. RI BHOI, MEGHALAYA, REP. BY ITS CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI GOURAV AGARWAL. 2: SRI GOURAV AGARWAL S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL A CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY OF M/S. MEGHALAYA TRADING COMPANY R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSA VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER, HEAD OFFICE, DISPUR, GUWAHATI, KAMRUP (M) DIST., ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM Page No.# 2/4 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : DR. ASHOK SARAF, MR. A. KAUSHIK,B SARMA,MR P K BORA,MR S J SAIKIA,MR. N N DUTTA Advocate for the Respondent : GA, ASSAM, Linked Case : WP(C)/2332/2018 M/S MEGHALAYA TRADING COMPANY AND ANR. A REGD. PROPRIETORSHIP FIRM HAVING ITS REGD. OFFICE AT 10TH MILE P.O. BYRNIHAT DIST. RI BHOI MEGHALAYA REP. BY ITS CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY SRI GOURAV AGARWAL. 2: SRI GOURAV AGARWAL S/O. LT. O.P. AGARWAL A CONSTITUENT AND LAWFUL ATTORNEY OF M/S. MEGHALAYA TRADING COMPANY R/O. FLAT NO. 203 MAINAKUNJ APARTMENT SIKRIA COMPOUND CHRISTIAN BASTI GUWAHATI P.S. DISPUR KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. REP. BY THE CHIEF GENERAL MANAGER HEAD OFFICE DISPUR GUWAHATI Page No.# 3/4 KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 2:THE CHIEF MANAGER STATE BANK OF INDIA S.M.E. BRANCH G.S. ROAD GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DIST. ASSAM 3:THE OFFICER IN CHARGE DISPUR POLICE STATION DISPUR GUWAHATI KAMRUP (M) DISTRICT ASSAM ------------ Advocate for : MR. H DAS Advocate for : GA ASSAM appearing for THE STATE BANK OF INDIA AND 2 ORS. BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE ANJAN MONI KALITA ORDER Date : 27.05.2026 Heard Mr. A. Kaushik, learned counsel for the applicant. Also heard Mr. H. K. Hazarika, learned counsel for the respondent No.3. The connected writ petition i.e., WP(C)/2332/2018 was dismissed for non- prosecution. The instant Miscellaneous Case has been filed for restoration of the case. After perusing the reasons as explained in the instant Miscellaneous Case, this Court is convinced that the matter should be restored. Accordingly, the Miscellaneous Case is disposed of by restoring the Page No.# 4/4 connected writ petition. Let the matter be listed after 2(two) weeks. Registry to reflect the name of the learned Standing Counsel, SBI in the cause list. JUDGE Comparing Assistant