Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
SL. No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s
order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS
15.06.2026
WPSB No. 310 of 2026 Sanjay Dalakoti
.....Petitioner Vs. State of Uttarakhand & another
....Respondents Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J. Hon’ble Subhash Upadhyay, J.
1. Mr. B.D. Upadhyaya, learned Senior Counsel assisted by Mr. Tushar Upadhyaya, learned counsel for the petitioner.
2. Mr. B.P.S. Mer, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Modification Application (MCC No.01 of 2026)
3. Heard learned counsel for the parties.
4. The case of the petitioner is that on account of typographical error, the date of representation came to be mentioned as 31.03.2025 in place of 31.03.2026 in the prayer clause. Consequently, while passing the order, this Court, in its order dated 03.06.2026, has directed respondent no.1 to decide the representation supposedly made by the petitioner on 31.03.2025. The petitioner has prayed for permission to correct the prayer clause and for consequential corrections in our order.
5. Accordingly, the prayer is allowed. Let necessary correction(s) in the prayer clause be carried out during course of the day.
6. The order dated 03.06.2026 is, accordingly, corrected and the date of representation shall be read as 31.03.2026 instead of 31.03.2025. Respondent no.1 shall have three weeks’ time from the date of communication of the original
order dated 03.06.2026 along with the present order for
deciding the representation of the petitioner.
7. Modification application (MCC No.01 of 2026) stands
disposed of accordingly.
(Subhash Upadhyay, J.) (Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 15.06.2026
15.06.2026 NISHANT