[2026:RJ-JP:21251] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6786/2026 Yash @ Balla S/o Gopal, R/o Chauhan Colony, Gali No. 2, Bijaynagar Road, P.s. Beawar City, District Beawar. (Presently Lodged At District- Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through P.p. ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7345/2026 Pawan Singh S/o Samundra Singh, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Jaswantpura Nadi, Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar. (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Ajmer). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 7563/2026 Hemant Pareta S/o Mukut Bihari, Aged About 26 Years, R/o Dhawatkalan, P.s. Rawatbhata, District Chittorgarh, (Presently Lodged At District Jail Beawar). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Pp ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Achin Singhal Mr. Yashvardhan Agarwal for Mr. J.P. Gupta Mr. Jiya Ur Rahman For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/05/2026 [2026:RJ-JP:21251] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-6786/2026] 1. The petitioners have filed these bail applications under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.76/2026 registered at Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar for offences under Sections 54, 55, 60(b), 61(2), 111(2)(a) of BNS, 2023 and 4, 25 of Arms Act, 1959. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioners as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. The allegations levelled against the present petitioners are that they hatched a conspiracy to commit murder; however, no substantial material is available on record which shows that the petitioners are involved in any such conspiracy. The police arrested the petitioners merely on the basis of their alleged criminal antecedents. Petitioners- Yash, Hemant are behind the bars since 13.03.2026 and Pawan is behind the bars since 25.04.2026 though six cases have been reported against Yash, four cases against Pawan and three cases against Hemant have been reported, however, in all the cases they are on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioners in further custody, consequently, the bail applications deserves to be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail applications. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made by learned counsel for the petitioners but without expressing any opinion on [2026:RJ-JP:21251] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-6786/2026] merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioners. 6. Consequently, the bail applications under Section 483 B.N.S.S. are allowed and it is directed that the petitioners Yash @ Balla S/o Gopal, Pawan Singh S/o Samundra Singh and Hemant Pareta S/o Mukut Bihari, be released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial with following further conditions:- (i) that the petitioners shall mark their presence before the SHO, Police Station Beawar Sadar, District Beawar in every 15 days of each month till conclusion of trial. (ii) The concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register for this purpose. In case, the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned Police Station as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to trial court in this regard. (iii) The petitioners shall not repeat any offence in future. (iv) If breach of any of the directions is reported or come to the notice of the trial court the same shall alone be a reason for learned Public Prosecutor to apply for cancellation of bail and trial court shall be at liberty to cancel the bail. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/57-59