Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6969 (PAT)

Pankaj Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./8686/2026 · 2026-02-23

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.8686 of 2026 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-57 Year-2025 Thana- RAJEPUR District- East Champaran ====================================================== 1. Pankaj Kumar S/O Ram Pravesh Bhagat @ Ram Prawesh Bhagat Resident of village- Bulaki tola, P.S.- Rajepur, Dist.- East Champaran. 2. Shashi Ranjan Kumar S/O Ram Pravesh Bhagat @ Ram Prawesh Bhagat Resident of village- Bulaki tola, P.S.- Rajepur, Dist.- East Champaran. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioners : Mr. Abhishek Kumar, Advocate For the State : Mr. Parmanand Kumar, APP ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 2 23-02-2026 Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners and learned APP appearing on behalf of the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend their arrest in a case registered for the offence punishable under Sections 126(2), 115(2), 117(2), 118(2), 109, 352, 351(2) and 3(5) of the B.N.S.. 3. As per prosecution case, it is alleged that all the F.I.R. named accused persons, including these petitioners, assaulted son and cousin brother of son of informant due to which they sustained multiple injuries. 4. It is submitted by learned counsel appearing on Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8686 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 2/3 behalf of the petitioners that petitioners are quite innocent and have committed no offence. As a matter of fact, on account of long standing land dispute between the parties, maar-peet took place in which both sides sustained injuries. There is case and counter-case. Allegation of assault is general and omnibus and no specific accusation of overt act has been alleged against these petitioners. Doctor has found the injuries, allegedly caused by these petitioners, simple in nature. 5. Learned A.P.P. for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. 6. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, case and counter-case between the parties and nature of injuries sustained by the injured, the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail to the petitioners is allowed. 7. Accordingly, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the above named petitioners be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bond of Rs. 10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Chief Judicial Magistrate, East Champaran, Motihari in connection with Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.8686 of 2026(2) dt.23-02-2026 3/3 Rajepur P.S. Case No. 57 of 2025, subject to condition as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S.. shashank/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T