Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Himachal Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6969 (HP)

YOG RAJ v. STATE OF HP

CRMPM/344/2026 · 2026-03-13

Ranjan Sharma, Vivek Singh Thakur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Yog Raj Vs. State of Himachal Pradesh Cr.MP(M) No. 344 of 2026 13.03.2026 Present: Mr. Aditya Singh Thakur, Advocate, vice Mr. Rajesh Verma, Advocate, for the applicant- appellant. Mr. Pawan Nadda, Additional Advocate General, for the respondent/State. Cr. MP(M) No. 344 of 2026 The applicant is convict and serving his sentence. There is delay of 09 days’ in filing the appeal against conviction. For the reasons stated in the application, aforesaid delay is condoned and the application stands disposed of. Cr. A. (C-DB) No. ______/2026 (ST No.1130 of 2026) Be registered. Notice. Mr. Pawan Nadda, learned Additional Advocate General, appears and waives service of notice on behalf of the respondent. Admit. Records be requisitioned. List for final hearing in due course after completion. (Vivek Singh Thakur) Judge (Ranjan Sharma) Judge 13th March, 2026 (Shamsh Tabrez)