Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6968 (UTT)

KAMLESH SINGH BISHT v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/338/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4776-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 15th June, 2026 Writ Petition (S/B) No. 338 of 2026 Kamlesh Singh Bisht ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others -----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. Vipul Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. Gajendra Tripathi and Mr. S.M.S. Mehta, learned Standing Counsel for the State. Mr. Amar Murti Shukla, learned counsel for the respondent no.3. Mr. C.S. Rawat, learned counsel for the respondent no.4. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 1. The present writ petition has been filed with the grievance that respondent no.3 has not handed over the charge of the post of Additional Chief Officer, Zila Panchayat, Udham Singh Nagar, to the petitioner, although, he was transferred to the said post vide order dated 26.05.2026 by the State Government. 2. Learned counsel for the Zila Panchayat, on basis of instructions received, states that charge has been handed over to the petitioner on 11.06.2026, which is not disputed by learned counsel for the petitioner. 3. As such, the cause does not survive. The writ petition is disposed of as infructuous. 1 2026:UHC:4776-DB 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 15.06.2026 Kaushal/PP 2