HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 27950 of 2021 Court No. - 77 HON'BLE SANJAY KUMAR PACHORI, J. 1. Heard Sri Ravindra Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants, Sri Shyam Chandra Pandey, learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2, Sri Karunakar Singh, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material on record. 2. The present application under Section 482, Cr.P.C. has been filed to quash the order dated 28.10.2021 passed by Additional Sessions Judge/F.T.C., Court No. 1, Kaushambi in Criminal Revision No. 10 of 2020, whereby the revisional court affirmed the order dated 31.10.2019 passed by Civil Judge (J.D.)/Judicial Magistrate, Kaushambi passed in case No. 92 of 2019, whereby learned Magistrate summoned present applicants under Section 406, I.P.C. and Section 6 of Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. Learned counsel for both the parties jointly submit that parties settled their matrimonial dispute with regard to offence aforesaid on the basis of compromise before the Mediation and Conciliation Centre of this Court and detailed report dated 22.2.2023 is on record. The applicant No. 1 and opposite party No. 2 are living as husband and wife peacefully. 4. In view of the above facts, circumstances and keeping in mind the position of law laid down by the Supreme Court in Gian Singh v. State of Punjab & another, (2012) 10 SCC 303, Madhavrao Jiwajirao Scindia v. Sambhajirao Chandraojirao Angre, (1988) 1 SCC 692 and Parbathbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Bhimsinghbhai Karmur & Others v. State of Gujarat & another, (2017) 9 SCC 641, the present application under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. stands allowed. The entire proceedings relating to aforesaid case are, hereby, quashed. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Ravindra Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A., Shyam Chandra Pandey Khurshid Ahmed And 5 Others .....Applicant(s) State Of U.P And Another .....Opposite Party(s) 5. This order is being passed by this Court after hearing the contesting parties. If at all, opposite party no. 2 feels that he has been duped or betrayed, then in that event, he may file recall application explaining the reasons for filing the said application. 6. The parties may file the certified copy of this order before the court concerned within four weeks from today. 7. Interim order, if any, stands vacated. September 16, 2026 T. Sinha A482 No. 27950 of 2021 2 (Sanjay Kumar Pachori,J.) Digitally signed by :- TRIPTI SINHA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad