Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6964 (JHR)

DILWAR ANSARI ALIAS DILWAR ANSARI ALIAS DILAWAR ANSARI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./1452/2026 · 2026-04-17

Anubha Rawat Choudhary

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:JHHC:11104 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 1452 of 2026 Dilwar Ansari @ Dilwar Ansari @ Dilawar Ansari, S/o Moin Ansari, R/o Village- Kapsa, Post Office- Sarath and PS- Sarath, District- Deoghar, Jharkhand. … … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand. … … Opp. Party --- CORAM :HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE ANUBHA RAWAT CHOUDHARY --- For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mrs. Lily Sahay, APP --- 03/17.04.2026 Heard the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in custody since 22.12.2025 in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.171 of 2025, for the offences registered under Sections 319(2), 318(4), 338, 336(3), 340 (2), 61(2) of the B.N.S. 2023 and Sections 66(B), 66(C), 66(D) and 84(C) of the I.T. Act, pending in the court of learned Addl. Sessions Judge II cum Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, Deoghar. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has been falsely implicated in the case and he is in custody since 22.12.2025. Petitioner has no criminal antecedent and as per the allegations, there are two victims connecting the petitioner. 4. He has further submitted that similarly situated co-accused, Lukman Ansari has already been enlarged on bail in B.A. No.1402 of 2026 and further co-accused, Rajesh Mishra @ Rajesh Das has already been enlarged on bail by the Co-ordinate Bench vide order dated 11.03.2026 in B.A. No.1537 of 2026. 5. Learned counsel for the opposite party-State has opposed the prayer. However, the aforesaid submissions are not being disputed. 6. After hearing the learned counsel for the parties and considering the custody of the petitioner and that he has no criminal antecedent and further similarly situated co-accused persons have already been enlarged on bail, the petitioner above named is directed to be enlarged on bail on his furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rs. Twenty-five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge II cum Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime Cases, 2026:JHHC:11104 2 Deoghar, in connection with Deoghar Cyber P.S. Case No.171 of 2025 on the following conditions: (i) One of the bailors would be the present pairvikar of the petitioner. (ii) The other bailor should be his close relative. (iii) The petitioner will attend the court on each and every date and on account of his single default, the learned court shall cancel the bail bond furnished by the petitioner. (iv) The petitioner will deposit a self-attested copy of his Aadhar Card along with his mobile number before the learned court which he will not change during the pendency of the case without prior permission of the court. (v) The petitioner shall fully co-operate with the proceedings before the learned court below. 7. Let this order along with a copy of the affidavit filed with the bail petition be communicated to the court concerned through FAX/e-mail. 8. The instant bail application is allowed with the aforesaid conditions. (Anubha Rawat Choudhary, J.) Dated: ………….. Uploaded on: ……….. sandeep/