p. 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.5779 of 2026 Bidyadhara Samal …. Petitioner Ms. Jayanti Naik. Advocate -versus- National Highways Authority of India, Regional Officer, Khurdha and Others …. Opp. Parties Mr. Siba Narayan Biswal, Additional Standing Counsel CORAM: JUSTICE K.R. MOHAPATRA JUSTICE SANJAY KUMAR MISHRA ORDER Order No. 22.04.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through hybrid mode. 2. Petitioner, in this writ petition, prays for the following relief:- “Under the circumstances stated above, it is most respectfully prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be graciously pleased to admit the writ petition, issue notice to the Opposite Parties and after hearing from Advocates of the parties issue a writ in nature of mandamus directing the Opposite Parties to pay/release the Land acquisition compensation amount in favour of the petitioner within a stipulated time. And may pass any other order/ orders, direction/ directions as this Hon'ble court may deem fit and proper; And for this act of kindness, the petitioner as in duty bound shall ever pray.” 3. In course of hearing, Ms. Naik, learned counsel for the Petitioner submits that inadvertently some documents which are not related to the case have been filed. Relevant documents could not be p. 2 annexed to the writ petition. She, therefore, prays for withdrawal of the writ petition seeking liberty to file a fresh one with better particulars. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition stands disposed of as withdrawn with a liberty to the Petitioner to file a fresh writ petition with better particulars within a period of one month hence. (K.R. Mohapatra) Judge (S.K. Mishra) Himansu Judge