Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6960 (AP)

Kata Venkata Rushikesava v. SRI G.SAI PRASAD. IAS

CC/1119/2026 · 2026-07-26

Venkateswarlu Nimmagadda

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010110202026 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) MONDAY, THE 27th DAY OF JULY 2026 PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119 OF 2026 Between: 1. Kata Venkata Rushikesava, S/o.Kata Krishnaiah Aged about 30 years, R/o.25/730 Vasanthapeta, Proddatur, Kadapa YSR Kadapa District - 515 671 Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND 1. SRI G SAI PRASAD IAS, Principal Secretary Water Resources Department Government of Andhra Pradesh A.P. Secretariat, Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District, AP 2. SRI PEEYUSH KUMAR IAS, Principal Secretary, Finance Department, Govt.of A.P. A.P.Secretariat,Velagapudi Amaravati, Guntur District, AP ...Respondents Petition under Sections 10 to 12 of Contempt of Courts Act 1971 praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit file herein the High Court may be pleased to pleased to punish the respondents under Sec. 10 to 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for willfully and deliberately flouted the orders dt.24- 04-2025 W.P.No.6684/2024 Counsel for the Petitioner: D KODANDARAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondents: NAGARAJU PULLAGURA Counsel for the Respondents:SOMA RAJU YELISETTI 2 The Court made the following order: 3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA CONTEMPT CASE NO:1119 OF 2026 ORDER: This contempt case is filed against the respondents for willful disobedience of the orders dated 24.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6684 of 2024. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned counsel for the respondents. 3. When the matter is taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the respondents have complied with the orders dated 24.04.2025 passed by this Court in W.P.No.6684 of 2024 and hence, no further orders are required to be passed in the contempt case. 4. Recording the said submission, the Contempt Case is closed. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in the contempt case shall stand closed. ________________________________ VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA, J 27.07.2026 BSP/TPS 4 36 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE VENKATESWARLU NIMMAGADDA (closed) CONTEMPT CASE NO: 1119 OF 2026 27.07.2026 BSP/TPS