PRIYANKA YADAV W/O SUBHASH CHAND YADAV D/O OMPRAKASH YADAV, , v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN
CRLW/324/2026 · 2026-03-17
Anil Kumar Upman
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 696 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 696 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2026:RJ-JP:11330] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Writ Petition No. 324/2026
1. Priyanka Yadav W/o Subhash Chand Yadav D/o Omprakash Yadav,, Aged About 22 Yeras (10.03.2004), R/o Dhabaiyo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 9 , Ranoli,sikar, Rajasthan- 332403.
2. Subhash Chand Yadav S/o Sugana Ram, Aged 38 Years ( 15.03.1987), R/o Tiwari Ka Bass, Tehsil Neemkathana, Dhani Gumansingh, Sikar, Rajasthan- 332703 . At Present Residing In Jaipur, Rajasthan. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State Of Rajasthan, Through Secretary Department Of Home Affairs Govt. Secretariat, Jaipur.
2. Director General Of Police, Police Headquarter, Lalkothi, Jaipur.
3. Superintendent Of Police, Sikar District, Sikar, Rajasthan.
4. The Station House Officer, Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar, Rajasthan- 332403.
5. Omprakash Yadav S/o Laxmanram Yadav, R/o Dhabaiyo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 9, Ranoli , Tehsil Dataramgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan- 332403. ( Father Of Petitioner No. 1).
6. Manoj Yadav S/o Laxmanram Yadav, R/o Dhabaiyo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 9, Ranoli , Tehsil Dataramgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan- 332403. ( Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1).
7. Rahul Yadav S/o Omprakash Yadav, R/o Dhabaiyo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 9, Ranoli , Tehsil Dataramgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan- 332403. ( Brother Of Petitioner No. 1).
8. Banwari Yadav S/o Maluram Yadav, R/o Dhabaiyo Ki Dhani, Ward No. 9, Ranoli , Tehsil Dataramgarh, Sikar, Rajasthan- 332403. ( Parental Uncle Of Petitioner No. 1). ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Ms. Tejashwi Sharma For Respondent(s) : Mr. Rajesh Choudhary, GA-cum-AAG with Mr. M.S. Shekhawat, PP
[2026:RJ-JP:11330] (2 of 3) [CRLW-324/2026] HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN
Order 17/03/2026
1. Defects pointed out by the Registry are overruled.
2. Petitioner No.1, who is 22 years old and petitioner No.2, who is 38 years old, are major and present in person. They have duly been identified by their counsel.
3. This criminal writ petition has been filed by petitioners seeking protection from the private respondent Nos.5 to 8 as they are apprehending danger to their life and liberty at the hands of private respondents.
4.
Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are mature enough to take decision of their life. It is submitted that petitioners have entered into marriage as per Hindu Rites and Customs at Rameshwar Mahadev Mandir, Amer Road, Jaipur, Rajasthan on 06.04.2025 and same has been registered on 12.06.2025. The certificate of registration of marriage of the petitioners is annexed with this petition. Counsel further submits that petitioners are living peacefully as husband and wife but respondent Nos.5 to 8 are not happy with their marriage and petitioners are receiving continuous threats from the private respondents, so they prayed for protection.
5. Under instructions of petitioner No.1, learned counsel submits that petitioner No.1 has entered into marriage voluntarily with petitioner No.2.
[2026:RJ-JP:11330] (3 of 3) [CRLW-324/2026]
6. In view of the above factual averments, petitioners are
directed to file appropriate application seeking protection before respondent No.4-Station House Officer, Police Station Ranoli, District Sikar, Rajasthan and respondent no.4 is directed to provide protection to the petitioners, if any application is filed before him and he would ensure that no harm is caused to the petitioners.
7. The criminal writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of.
8. Stay application and pending application(s), if any, stand
disposed of.
9. However, it is made clear that this order will not affect the civil/ criminal proceedings, if any, in the present matter.
(ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /197