IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH, SHIMLA CWP No. 2575 of 2026 Decided on: 05.03.2026 Sh. Madan Lal … Petitioner Versus State of Himachal Pradesh and another … Respondents Coram Hon’ble Mr. Justice Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge. Whether approved for reporting?1 _____________________________________________________ For the petitioner : Mr. Rakesh Kumar Dogra, Advocate. For the respondents : Mr. Rajat Chauhan, Assistant Advocate General for respondents- State. Ajay Mohan Goel, Judge (Oral) By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has inter alia prayed for the following reliefs:- “A. That the respondents may very kindly be directed to consider the request of petitioner for adjustment in stations as mentioned in para 11 of the Civil Writ Petition keeping in view the health problem and as per the transfer policy.” 2. Without interfering with the impugned transfer order, this petition is disposed of with the direction that in the event of the petitioner approaching the Authority by way of a fresh representation within one week from today, let appropriate decision be taken thereupon within two weeks from the date of receipt of the 1 Whether reporters of the local papers may be allowed to see the judgment? 2 representation by passing a reasoned and speaking order. The petitioner is at liberty to avail the leave of kind due and he may not be forced to join at new station till decision on the representation. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any also stand disposed of accordingly. (Ajay Mohan Goel) Judge March 05, 2026 (narender)