MAKSUD ANSARI @ BAHIRA @ MADHULIYA v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND
B.A./3240/2026 · 2026-04-22
Anil Kumar Choudhary
body2026
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6958 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2026 DAILYLAW 6958 (JHR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
( 2026:JHHC:11737 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI
B.A. No. 3240 of 2026
------ Maksud Ansari @ Bahira @ Madhuliya, aged about 50 years, son of Harun Ansari, resident of Village-Dighari, P.O.- Chainpur, P.S.-Narayanpur, Dist.-Jamtara
… Petitioner
Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party
------
CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY
------
For the Petitioner : Mr. Kaushal K. Mishra, Advocate For the State
: Mr. Bishambhar Shastri, Addl. P.P. ------
Order No.02 Dated- 22.04.2026
Heard the parties.
The petitioner has moved this Court for grant of bail in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No.120 of 2025 registered for the offences punishable under sections 303(2) of the B.N.S., 2023.
The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner committed theft of motorcycle and sold the same to Bakrid Mian. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioner are all false and the petitioner has been implicated in this case only on the basis of the statement of Bakrid Mian. It is next submitted that charge sheet has been submitted against the petitioner, in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 17.11.2025, as has been mentioned in paragraph no. 08 of the bail application. It is next submitted that the petitioner undertakes to cooperate with the trial of the case and further undertakes that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be admitted to bail.
The learned Addl. P.P. opposes the prayer for bail.
Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am inclined to enlarge the abovenamed petitioner on bail. Accordingly, the petitioner is directed to be
released on bail on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Jamtara, in connection with Jamtara P.S. Case No.120 of 2025 with the condition that the petitioner will cooperate with the trial of the case and will furnish his mobile number and a copy of his Aadhar Card in the court below with the undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case, with further condition that he will not annoy or disturb the witnesses of the case in any manner during the trial of the case.
(Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.)
22.04.2026 Gunjan-