Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6955 (RAJ)

SABBIR MOHMMAD S/O JABBAR v. THE STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/6665/2026 · 2026-05-20

Pramil Kumar Mathur

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2026:RJ-JP:21244] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 6665/2026 Sabbir Mohmmad S/o Jabbar, Aged About 32 Years, R/o Bhagwanpura, Police Station Pushkar, District Ajmer (Raj.) (At Present In Central Jail Ajmer) ----Petitioner Versus The State Of Rajasthan, Through Its Public Prosecutor. ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Anshuman Saxena Mr. Vishal Gurjar Ms. Shilpa Choudhary For Respondent(s) : Mr. Jaiprakash Tiwari, PP Ms. Saroj Choudhary, CI, SHO, PS Pisangan, Ajmer HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR Order 20/05/2026 1. The petitioner has preferred this bail application under Section 483 of BNSS in FIR No.131/2025 registered at Police Station Pisangan, District Ajmer for offences under Section 103(1), 238(a) and 61(2) of BNS, 2023. 2. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Public Prosecutor and perused the material available on record. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. The allegation levelled against the present petitioner pertains to the abetment of suicide of the deceased Kalu Singh with the reason that the petitioner had illicit relations with the wife of the deceased Kalu Singh. It is further submitted that the petitioner has falsely been implicated in the present case on false and concocted grounds, primarily based on circumstantial evidence i.e. call detail records. The charge- [2026:RJ-JP:21244] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-6665/2026] sheet filed in the matter also reveals that the deceased was employed as a driver by the petitioner and due to this the petitioner remained in regular contact with the deceased. The trial has already commenced and statements of prosecution witnesses PW-1 to PW-13 have been recorded. Petitioner is behind the bars since 26.08.2025 though one case has been reported against him which is minor offence, however, in that case he is already on bail. The trial of the case will take considerable time, therefore, no fruitful purpose would be served by keeping the petitioner in further custody, consequently, the bail application of the petitioner may be allowed. 4. Learned Public Prosecutor has vehemently opposed the bail application. 5. On consideration of the rival submissions and material available on record and in light of submission made on behalf of petitioner but without expressing any opinion on merits/demerits of the case, I am inclined to grant benefit of bail to the petitioner. 6. Consequently, the bail application under Section 483 B.N.S.S. is allowed and it is directed that the petitioner Sabbir Mohmmad S/o Jabbar, be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of the learned trial court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court on all subsequent dates of hearing till conclusion of the trial. (PRAMIL KUMAR MATHUR),J Chandan/52