Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6951 (UTT)

DR SANJEEV KUMAR SHARMA v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPSB/312/2026 · 2026-06-15

Shri Manoj Kumar Gupta, Subhash Upadhyay

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4774-DB HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND AT NAINITAL THE HON’BLE CHIEF JUSTICE SHRI MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA AND THE HON’BLE JUSTICE SHRI SUBHASH UPADHYAY 15th June, 2026 Writ Petition (S/B) No. 312 of 2026 Dr. Sanjeev Kumar Sharma ------Petitioner Versus State of Uttarakhand and others -----Respondents ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Presence:- Mr. S.S.Yadav, learned counsel for the petitioner. Mr. B.S.Parihar, learned Standing Counsel for the State. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- JUDGMENT: (per Manoj Kumar Gupta, C.J.) 1. The present writ petition has been filed praying for the following reliefs:- “I. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 1 and 2 to constitute a committee in the chairmanship of the Director Higher Education Government of Uttarakhand, and Additional Director Higher Education and other responsible office holder of the Government of Uttarakhand and complete the report and provide the benefit of CAS to the petitioner for the post of Associate Professor in the tune of the exercise made by the parent state of U.P. Department of Higher Education dated vide letter no. 14/2026/99/-5-2026-1951003 dated 31 March 2026, as early as possible (Contained as Annexure No.7,8,9. Page 76-85 to the writ petition) so far it relates to the petitioner. II. Issue a writ order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the directing respondents no.1 and 2 to take decision on the representation dated 27-03-2026 of the petitioner no.1 in the light of vide letter no. 14/2026/99/-5- 2026-1951003 dated 31 March 2026. (Contained as Annexure No.6 page no.71-75 to this writ petition.” 2. Learned State Counsel very fairly states that the representation filed by the petitioner would be decided. 3. Accordingly, at this stage, the writ petition is disposed of with direction to respondent no.1 to decide the 1 2026:UHC:4774-DB representation of the petitioner dated 27.03.2026 within eight weeks’ from the date of communication of the instant order along with photostat copy of the representation. 4. Pending application, if any, also stands disposed of. (MANOJ KUMAR GUPTA, C.J.) (SUBHASH UPADHYAY, J.) Dated: 15.06.2026 Kaushal/PP 2