HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 50940 of 2013 Court No. - 5 HON'BLE PRAKASH PADIA, J. HON'BLE VIVEK SARAN, J. 1. The matter is listed under heading "Oldest pending cases for priority hearing". 2. List revised. Nobody is present on behalf of parties though learned Standing Counsel is present on behalf of the State respondent(s). 3. The writ petition is dismissed in default. 4. Interim order, if any granted earlier, stands vacated. 5. In case, any of the party is aggrieved with this order, he is free to move the recall application within one month from today. September 14, 2026 saqlain Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : N.C. Tripathi, Naveen Yadav Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Nisheeth Yadav (Vivek Saran,J.) (Prakash Padia,J.) Yogendra Singh Bohra .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) Digitally signed by :- SYED MOHAMMAD SAQLAIN HAIDER High Court of Judicature at Allahabad