Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 695 (UTT)

POOJA DEVI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/234/2026 · 2026-01-22

Alok Mahra

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

No Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGES’S ORDERS WPMS No. 234 of 2026 Hon’ble Alok Mahra, J. Mr. Mehboob Rahi and Mr. Vikramaditya Buddhist, learned counsels for the petitioners. 2. Mr. Yogesh Chandra Tiwari, learned Standing Counsel for the State. 3. By means of the present writ petition, petitioners have sought the following reliefs:- “(i) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus restraining Respondent No. 5 from carrying out any encroachment, demolition or obstruction on the public road comprised in Khasra Nos. 106, 107 and 108, Khata No. 191, situated at Manas Vihas Colony, Village Paniali. (ii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the respondents Nos. 2 to 4 to ensure maintenance of status quo at the site and to provide necessary Police protection to keep the public road free from obstruction. (iii) To issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of Mandamus directing the concerned authorities to take appropriate legal action against Respondent no. 5 for damaging public property and disturbing public peace.” 4. The relief as sought by the petitioners cannot be granted in a Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India. 5. Since, the disputed questions of facts are involved, therefore, the Court finds no merit in the writ petition for interference. Accordingly, the present writ petition is liable to be dismissed and is hereby dismissed. 6. However, petitioners are at liberty to approach the appropriate forum, for redressing their grievances. (Alok Mahra J.) Vacation Judge 22.01.2026 Ujjwal