[2026:RJ-JP:10529] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 4521/2026 Kumar Sain, S/o Ratiram, Aged About 65 Years, R/o Nagla Brahman, Gram Odeljat, Panchayat Audelgadi, Tehsil Roopwas, District Bharatpur, Rajasthan 321404. ----Petitioner Versus 1. The State Of Rajasthan, Through Principal Secretary, Rural Development And Panchayati Raj Department, Jaipur. 2. District Collector, District Bharatpur. 3. Sub - Divisional Officer, Roopbash, District. Bharatpur. 4. Block Development Officer, (Gram Vikas Adhikari), Panchayat Samiti Roopwas, Bharatpur (Raj.) ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Vichitr, through V.C. For Respondent(s) : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUROOP SINGHI Order 12/03/2026 1. The present petition has been filed by the petitioner with the following prayers:- "It is, therefore, most respectfully prayed that your lordship may kindly be pleased to accept this writ petition and (i) By Issue an appropriate writ, order or direction, preferably in the nature of Mandamus, directing the respondents to forthwith demolish the unauthorized gate; (ii) Direct District Collector/SP Bharatpur to provide police assistance within 7 days; [2026:RJ-JP:10529] (2 of 3) [CW-4521/2026] (iii) Issue any other writ order or direction, which this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper, may kindly be passed in favour of the petitioner.” 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that in the present matter, the petitioner has submitted a representation before the Sub-Divisional Officer, District Bharatpur, however, no heed was paid to the said representation by the Sub-Divisional Officer, District Bharatpur. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner prays that the present writ petition be disposed of in light of the order dated 30.01.2019 passed by the Division Bench of this Court in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena & Ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. [D.B. Civil Writ Petition (PIL) No.10819/2018] with liberty to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the Public Land Protection Cell (hereinafter referred to as ‘PLPC’) constituted in compliance of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra). 4. In that view of the matter, the present writ petition stands disposed of in light of the order passed in the case of Jagdish Prasad Meena (supra) with a direction to the petitioner to file representation(s) before the PLPC. It is further directed that the PLPC shall decide the representation(s), if any, filed by the petitioner, after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner within a period of two months from the date of receipt of this order. 5. Pending application(s), if any, stand disposed of. 6. Needless to say, this order has been passed only to decide the petitioner’s representation and in no manner is to be [2026:RJ-JP:10529] (3 of 3) [CW-4521/2026] construed as a direction to decide the said representation in a particular manner. (ANUROOP SINGHI),J DIKSHA MISHRA /14