Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Uttarakhand · body

2026 DAILYLAW 6948 (UTT)

GOVINDU RAJYALAKSHAMI v. STATE OF UTTARAKHAND

WPMS/1785/2026 · 2026-06-16

Manoj Kumar Tiwari

body2026

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

2026:UHC:4858 SL. No. Date Office Notes, reports, orders or proceedings or directions and Registrar’s order with Signatures COURT’S OR JUDGE’S ORDERS WPMS 1785/2026 Hon’ble Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J. Mr. Parikshit Saini, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Verma, Additional AG, for the State. Mr. Pawan Sanwal, Advocate, i/b Mr. Rahul Consul, Advocate for the MDDA. (2) According to petitioner, she is resident of Jalvayu Vihar in District Dehradun. According to her, her neighbour is demolishing his house for reconstruction, which is endangering the house of petitioner. In this regard, petitioner has made a representation to Mussoorie Dehradun Development Authority. Learned Counsel for the petitioner submits that Secretary, MDDA be directed to take decision on that representation. (3) Writ petition is, accordingly, disposed of with direction to Secretary, MDDA to examine the issue raised by the petitioner and take decision, as per law, on her representation within eight weeks from the date of presentation of certified copy of this order. It goes without saying that person, who is demolishing his house, shall also be heard before taking any decision in the matter. (Manoj Kumar Tiwari, J.) 16.6.2026 Pr PRABODH KUMAR Digitally signed by PRABODH KUMAR DN: c=IN, o=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, ou=HIGH COURT OF UTTARAKHAND, 2.5.4.20=3a082a00a95aff911a9559743af8f21c50602ff6eae4e61af3aeab198d462 503, postalCode=263001, st=UTTARAKHAND, serialNumber=0DC111E8D8CA66E16B940EFDF806ACCC1AB588052DF6FCA58C 67F3C91957BE53, cn=PRABODH KUMAR Date: 2026.06.16 16:46:20 +05'30' 2026:UHC:4858